.

Part 1: After More Than 15 Years With District, O'Neill Closes Book on Chatham Career

Departing superintendent looks back on accomplishments, challenges over the years.

Jim O'Neill said when he wakes up on Friday, he has a plan.

"I'm going to take my son's car into the dealership," O'Neill said Monday. "Just so I have something to do."

The day would have been a holiday for him anyway, except for one thing. Friday will be the first day in more than 15 years that O'Neill will not be an employee of the .

Looking Back on the Memories

O'Neill came to Chatham in December 1996 as the new principal of . He became an assistant superintendent less than four years later and superintendent three years after that.

During his tenure in Chatham, O'Neill said he has seen the population grow while simultaneously the academic achievements of students improved.

"It’s almost invariable, as your pool becomes larger, that the norm decreases and goes down," O'Neill said.

Yet in the nearly 16 years that O'Neill has been in Chatham, while the student population grew from approximately 2,700 to more than 4,000, he said that the percentage of graduating seniors attending top universities has grown from about 66 percent to 75.

"I think that we would have been happy if the district stayed the same, and our performance has actually increased," he said. "I think that's something to be proud of."

Schools and State

At the start of the 2010-11 academic year, O'Neill said two of the biggest challenges the district had was the continued student enrollment growth and the new 2-percent tax levy cap, which Gov. Chris Christie lowered from the previous 4-percent cap. He did not anticipate then that Christie's cap on school administrator salaries, which was then only a proposal, would prompt his retirement.

With the school year closing, O'Neill has similar concerns.

"We're growing more than we expected," he said, referring to , which currently has  14 sections with 25 or 26 students in each class. In his last Board of Education meeting as superintendent, O'Neill recommended to the board that they create another section of fourth grade to help reduce the class sizes.

"Kindergarten and first grade are a little problematic also [for 2011-12 class]," O'Neill said. "It's not that the whole grade is full, but that in certain schools it's full."

For those younger grades, O'Neill believes a cost-effective solution would be to send some children to a different school other than the one they live closest to, instead of adding a section.

"When you create a section, it's at least $50,000 to $55,000 for a teacher, $12,000 to $15,000 for benefits," O'Neill said, and with the two percent cap, "We can't just keep creating positions that we can't fund."

The cap also makes it difficult to invest in the kind of technology that O'Neill thinks is essential to shaping intellectually curious and passionate students. A teacher's ability to adapt and utilize technology in the classroom has been a big factor in O'Neill's hiring. He said he had "never seen anything change the dynamic of a classroom the way that Smartboards have," and teachers should have the abilities to make the most of that technology.

"I would tell you that our standards are high enough for teachers now that I'm not sure I would hire me when I was a teacher," O'Neill said. "And I think I was a pretty good teacher, but I didn't do what we require of teachers nowadays. We didn't have the technology."

Part of O'Neill's legacy, he believes, is in the teachers he hired during his years as superintendent who remain with the district as he departs.

"There were other times in this [district]'s history where I would have come along and I would never have had a chance to hire people, and nobody could have come along at a time that had as many people to hire as I did," O'Neill said.

With the 2-percent cap on budgets, O'Neill thinks districts will have a difficult time investing in that kind of technology. Chatham has made large investments in the past, which O'Neill says have "paid dividends." He cites the fiber network system that the district installed. "Even though we spent $500,000 or $600,000 to install the phone and Internet, what happens now? We own that. We don't pay anything internally. ...

"We save money every month because we put that in. Over the course of time we'll have more than paid off what it cost us to put that in," he said. "With the two percent cap, I don't know how schools could invest in technology like we did."

Other changes made to the way school districts run, from salary caps to the health care and pension reform bill which Gov. Chris Christie signed into law on Tuesday, have O'Neill concerned about the future of New Jersey schools. "I'm not sure that New Jersey will continue to be as attractive a place to teach in as it has been in the past," he said.

Though he agrees some kind of reform was needed, O'Neill said he found the bill "much more anti-labor than I thought the Democrats would have supported. ... I don't know why the Democrats didn't put forth their own bill."

Editor's note: This is the first of a two-part series looking back on Superintendent Jim O'Neill's career with the School District of the Chathams. Click here for Part 2.

Captain Jack June 30, 2011 at 12:40 PM
Goodbye already, enough is enough. Good riddance, couldn't stand this guy.
Ron Swanson June 30, 2011 at 01:26 PM
In general a very good, dedicated and effective superintendent. However, some of the support he received from the Chatham community over the years bordered on embarrassing rock star idol worship. I believe it was time for him to move on, as evidenced by all of the comments he made in this article about the 2% cap. The cap isn't the problem - real estate taxes can't keep escalating by 4 or 5% or more each year to fund schools' needs, as that is not a sustainable situation for many residents for whom Chatham is becoming increasingly unaffordable. The problem is the disdain for suburban school districts demonstrated by Trenton and the out of touch NJ Supreme Court, which has directed the shipment of Chatham's income tax dollars to "needy" districts to an extreme and unfair degree, forcing districts like Chatham to rely exclusively on property tax funding. If Mr. O'Neill had spent a little more time pontificating against the unfair distribution of state aid as dictated by the ultra liberal NJ Supreme Court, and supported Gov. Christie's efforts to re-make that out of touch court so as to reverse the ridiculous Abbott ruling, he would have been a much more effective advocate for Chatham's schools. Instead he chose to take on the Governor in the press, and in doing so sealed his own fate.
Peter July 06, 2011 at 01:43 AM
This interesting article claims that the percentage of graduating CHS seniors attending top universities increased from 66% to 75% during O'Neill's watch... a better percentage to monitor would be this...How many of these seniors received athletic scholarships with the special help of Mr. Jeff Fritts, Mr. Tony Calandra(CHS Lax coach), Mr. Harvey Cohen(CHS AD) and the many parents who contributed their time and treasure($$$) to assure their sons a spot on college team? That is the question to ask...so does anyone know who names of these parents are? Just wondering...
Geoff July 06, 2011 at 02:15 AM
Finally someone asks the obvious. Look at Proto, Fritts, Gill, Eisenreich, Guida and Stephan. Worth mentioning that Coach Calandra now drives a fancy Mercedes. (Not bad for a middle school P..E. teacher. Oh yeah, btw Stephan's dad works for Mercedes Benz. Hmmmm.
Peter July 07, 2011 at 11:07 PM
So I guess "PAY to PLAY" is the norm for Chatham High athletics now? What a disgrace. As they say, "follow the money". Is "pay to play" even legal? These parents shouldn't be allowed to have that kind of influence, period. Where was the superintendent and athletic director when this alleged meddling was going on?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »