.

Kathy Abbott: Bailey Brower is Trying to Sabotage My Re-Election

Township Committee member says she's been 'attacked' as Tuesday's primary nears.

Kathy Abbott
Kathy Abbott

Dear Neighbors,

I have once again been attacked by my fellow Township Committee member, Bailey Brower—this time on the eve of the primary election. Those of you who have lived in Chatham Township for some time know of Mr. Brower’s penchant for rabidly attacking those who do not fully agree with him or who question him, and he is rarely encumbered by the truth. His goal this time is to dash my chances at reelection so he can promote his own favored candidates.

Mr. Brower’s political machine works by identifying an issue, clouding it by fear-mongering, and then distorting it in a public forum:

  • The sidewalk snow-shoveling issue is a perfect example. Mr. Brower was informed during a March 14, 2014 Township meeting that the prevailing law in New Jersey, as determined by a 2011 New Jersey Supreme Court case, Richard Luchejko v. City of Hoboken  is: “(1) an ordinance directing private persons to care for public property is remedial and does not grant individual citizens a right of action, (2) at common law, property owners had no duty to clear snow and ice from the public sidewalks abutting their land and, if a property owner decided to do so, he would not be liable unless his negligence created a new hazard.”  The only basis for Mr. Brower's continued discussion of property liability is to create unfounded fear about the subject. 
  • A second example of Mr. Brower’s fear mongering campaign is his statement that I championed the No Idling ordinance. I was not on the Township Committee when the ordinance was adopted. However, N.J.A.C. 7:27-14, contains exemptions to the no-idling law when the temperature falls below 25 degrees. As a result, there is no foundation in law for imagery of “a small child in the car in freezing weather with no heat” because the law would not permit that to happen.
  • The Linden Lane issue has been covered extensively in the press. However, the fact is that in 1956, Mr. Brower supported the public easement and his support is noted in the public record. Fifty years later, Mr. Brower stirred up controversy over the public easement that he had originally supported in order to support his own agenda. 
  • With respect to Mr. Brower’s criticism of my support of the refurbishment of the Colony Paddle Tennis Courts, I rebut by stating that the Township population includes residents who belong to private swim, golf and tennis clubs as well as residents who belong to the public recreational facilities. When the paddle tennis platforms were refurbished, over 50 residents signed up for paddle tennis memberships. It is absurd for Mr. Brower to link my support of continuing public recreational programs to the damage that occurred to them as a result of Superstorm Sandy. 
  • I will not justify Mr. Brower’s personal attack by politicizing Township personnel matters. I believe it is unethical to use Township employees as political footballs.  It is highly inappropriate for Mr. Brower to be publicly discussing confidential personnel issues, let alone publishing and widely mailing them.

In fact, Mr. Brower’s entire career on the Township Committee has been marked by self-interest and entrenchment.  His worst nightmare is two highly competent, well-educated members, such as Mike Kelly and me (we are a professional volunteer and a young retiree, respectively), who are fortunate to have the time to serve in a “full time” capacity, working for the people of Chatham Township. We will work full time to make Chatham Township the place we ALL want it to be. 

I know that the people of Chatham Township are smarter than Bailey Brower would have us believe. Don’t be fooled by his sad attempt at propaganda. Please tread the high road with Mike Kelly and me, and vote Abbott and Kelly on Tuesday, June 3. (Column 5, lines 8 and 9).

Thank you for your support!

Kathy Abbott

Chatham Examiner June 02, 2014 at 09:34 PM
Kathy is the only one on the committee who questions things, Tom. She acts in interest of town, not because she want to put a poil in her yard. Chatham is not the number one place to live, unless of course you are living in the past like Bailey Brower. He has a history of false statements against committee women, maybe he would like to take away their right to run for office.
A Buck and a Duck! June 02, 2014 at 09:39 PM
No to Abbott. Chatham Twp. was a number one place long before it became recognized in print as such, in fact it's gone down hill since that acknowledgement. We all graduated from the top colleges, and universities 40 years ago long before this town started having liberal ideas and trying to transform it into the 6th boro of NY. Why do some you people come here, to cut down trees and put in cement? Number one town, yeah those days were prior to the mid 80's.
Chatham Examiner June 02, 2014 at 09:47 PM
A Buck - your flawed reasoning and logic leads me to believe you in fact did not graduate from a top university. In has gone down hill, thanks to Bailey et al. Yes to Abbott
Tom Basta June 02, 2014 at 09:47 PM
Sorry to butt in here folks. Someone sent me an email about this and asked if I'm the "Tom" referenced above. I assure you that I'm not (maybe a little presumptuous, since there are numerous people with my first name involved in Town affairs). Not Chatham98. I hope everyone gets out and votes tomorrow!
A Buck and a Duck! June 03, 2014 at 02:09 PM
Yeah, ok.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »