patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Underfunded Superfund Program Still Cleaning Up

Federal program needs a stable funding source to be effective in a reasonable amount of time.

 

If it’s summer, it must be time for a Superfund site tour.

Last week, Rep. Rodney P. Frelinghuysen visited six sites in the 11th District, which includes Morris County and portions of Passaic, Somerset and Sussex counties, with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency administrator for Region 2.

All the locations—in Rockaway, Rockaway Township (2), Wharton, Dover and Fairfield—have cleanups in progress or are subject to continued monitoring.

They are just a few of New Jersey’s 112 sites on Superfund’s National Priorities List. We are the only state with more than 100 sites on the list of most contaminated locations. There are another 100 sites in the state subject to federal monitoring under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act program.

Morris County is home to 18 sites, including locations in Chatham Township, Chester Township, Montville, Morris Township, Parsippany and Washington Township. There are sites in Bridgewater and Hillsborough in Somerset, and Wayne in Passaic. The Passaic River itself is on the Superfund priorities list.

Established by Congress through the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, Superfund is the federal program that investigates and cleans up the country’s most hazardous waste sites.

It was enacted in response to the discovery of several toxic waste dump sites, including the infamous Love Canal in Niagra Falls, N.Y., where a community of homes and a school were built atop a defunct canal that had been used as a chemical dump.

Eleven known carcinogens were among the substances leaching up through the soil into backyards and homes. High rates of birth defects and miscarriages were reported. The federal government eventually evacuated the entire area.

Though not as well known, some of New Jersey’s sites have had their own harmful health effects. In Byram, for instance, 17 homes were contaminated by tricholoroethylene from the Mansfield Trail Dump Site, added to the list in March 2011. The state Department of Environmental Protection has installed water and air filtration and treatment systems in the homes. Including the site on the Superfund list will allow the EPA to further investigate the source of the contamination and conduct remediation.

Extensive work has been done at others to try to prevent illness.

The cleanup of the 1-acre Krysowaty Farm site in Hillsborough, where 500 drums of paint and dye washes had been dumped, was completed and the site was removed from the priorities list in 1989. Some 1,200 people got bottled water for drinking for a time and eventually were put on an alternative water supply line bringing clean water.

Maintenance activities continue at the Sharkey Landfill site in Parsippany and East Hanover. Groundwater on the 90-acre site is contaminated with benzene, lead, cadmium and chromium. The landfill was capped and steps taken to stop runoff into the Whippany and Rockaway rivers. Most of the work was completed in 2004.

Contaminants also were found to be seeping into the aquifer below Combe Fill South Landfill, on 115 acres in Chester and Washington townships, and draining into nearby Trout Brook. About 170 people live within a half mile of the site, most of them using wells for drinking water. A multi-level cleanup has been mostly completed, though a deep aquifer study in the works will determine the need for a new waterline to the homes.

Work is just beginning on other sites.

Soil on the 200-acre former Rolling Knolls Landfill in Chatham Township, which borders the Great Swamp National Wildlife Refuge and private homes, contains polychlorinated biphenyls and mercury, among other substances. Testing is underway and a remedial investigation report is due some time this year.

Despite its successes and the crucial nature of its work, the Superfund program has problems.

Perhaps the biggest is funding.

Unquestionably, the polluters should be the ones paying for the cleanups. But pinning blame on one or even several companies is not always possible, as some of the sites were used for dumping as far back as the late 1800s. In other cases, the responsible party is out of business or bankrupt. Still, when water and human lives are at stake, contamination needs to be removed.

In its earliest years, Superfund was funded by an excise tax on petroleum and chemical companies and, later, on a corporate environmental income tax. But at the end of 1995, Congress did not reauthorize the taxes, which has led to funding shortfalls and, in many cases, longer delays.

Consider the case of Rolling Knolls. The first contamination was discovered in 1999 and affirmed four years later. Soon after it was added to the priorities list. A remedial investigation and feasibility study began in 2005. Field work started in 2007 and the investigation report is due soon. That’s 13 years after the contamination was initially found and the start of a clean up is still a long ways away.

It shouldn’t take that long.

More money would help the agency make greater headway.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-6) keeps introducing a bill reinstating the taxes that had funded Superfund. The bill keeps dying. It is given a 0 percent chance of passage this year.

Other Congressional representatives—like Frelinghuysen, who sits on the powerful House Appropriations Committee that oversees the federal budget and is interested enough in the health of his constituents that he takes an annual tour of local Superfund sites—should join Pallone in his effort to ensure that the program has adequate funding.

Colleen O'Dea is a writer, editor, researcher, data analyst, web page designer and mapper with almost three decades in the news business.

This column appears on Patch sites serving communities in Morris, Passaic, Somerset and Sussex counties. Comments below may be by readers of any of those sites.

Related Topics: Rodney Frelinghuysen and Superfund sites
Do you support a reinstatement of a corporate environmental tax or polluter tax to fund toxic site cleanups? Tell us in the comments.

Nose Wayne

10:24 pm on Sunday, July 15, 2012

It's NOSE wonder their are so many illnesses in this state. Almost ALL these sites are near or in water sources that are used for consumption. When is this state going to stop with all these studies and work to get these areas cleaned up before any more people come down with cancers, breathing problems and other illnesses.ALL you politicians out there, SHOW US THE MONEY,NOT THE STUDY!!!

Reply

stewart resmer

9:11 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

a recent NJ supreme court ruling states that an owner of such properties is NOT compelled to either clean up, or disclose known contamination if the property is sold to another.
with courts that make decisions like that is it any wonder then that NJ has become a cauldron of toxic waste if no one is to be held liable and accountable for their actions?
an then to turn to the fed and say its not our responsibility? give us money to remediate the problem?

Reply

Rich Smith

9:02 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

I agree with both Nose and Stewart, this is a job that needs getting done. All the power of the Fed. Should be brought into use to get the violators to pay up. They made there fortunes by these bad practices now they should be held accountable. What about the ones that went belly up? Other like industries should be pitch in to cover the cleanups. Whatever!! Every time I pass that Super fund location in Wayne and see the farm right across the street it gives me the creeps. Super Fund was a well meaning effort with bad planning and, evidently, little muscles. But then too, corporate America was pulling lots of strings in those days as today.

Reply

Nose Wayne

11:08 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

Nice post Rich!! Corporate America pulled a lot of strings to get people re-elected so they could get away with cleaning up their sites and have the Federal Government do all the work thru the Super Fund. This country has to start thinking about the people and not greedy corporate america.

Reply

Justice

6:02 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Nose, "This country has to start thinking about the people and not greedy corporate america." Yes, it starts at the local level, at the town councils and the boe's.

Reply

art daughtry

8:11 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Colleen - The gov came up with a method of avoiding paying for clean ups many years ago. It is called the "Brownfields Act" and you should put some info and docs on this method of developing on this site. What the act does is permit 40 inches of clean fill to be brought in and the site "capped" so it can be developed.

While these sites are not called superfund sites, they would have been 30 years ago. The gov changed the definitions and created these approaches just as you say for funding reasons. The Walmart in Boonton is an example of what was a polluted site (PVO) that is now a "clean site" with the aid of the Brownsfield Act.

Art

Reply

Sick and Tired

9:30 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Frelinghuysen can tour all he wants. The 11th District needs a rep in Congress who will actually do something to get these sites cleaned up, not just take advantage of photo ops.

Sick and Tired

Reply

Enviro Equipment Inc.

10:32 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Frelinghuysen's record to date on environmental cleanup is appalling and having him tour a Superfund site as if he really cares about seeking more funding for its cleanup is a very definition of the word 'hypocrisy'.

Reply

Cara DePalma

11:22 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Rodney Frelinghysen has no vested interest in helping solve this problem since he considers himself unbeatable in "red" Morris County. If his job security was at stake, we may see some action, but why do that? It may actually help people!

Reply

clyde donovan

12:18 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

What about the two sites in the Mount Tabor section of Parsippany?

One is the site of a former methane-gas plant. The coal-gasification process produced a toxic stew of coal tars that contained 500 to 3,000 compounds known to be carcinogens. Former Parsippany Mayor Mimi Letts had a children's playground built right on top of this area.

The second site is the former Mount Tabor landfil. Who knows what was deposited in a landfill that dates to approimately 1869 and was probably in use for about 90 years. The site lies right behind homes on Whitewood Drive in Parsippany. Those houses have a Morris Plains mailing address. A Parsippany water well is said to be not far from this site - as the crow flies, and so in the Mount Tabor School.

The Morris County Freeholders just funded a measure to put Mount Tabor on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. Maybe that money would have been better spent on some hazardous-waste testing in Mount Tabor.

Reply

VietNam Vet

1:23 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

The problem is they want to get more funding, but congress is not going to give them any money because Odumbo/Osama needs more money for his campaign and for planinghis next $ 4 million vacation. In other words he needs the money to spend on more important things.

Reply

Leave a comment