patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Multiple Questions in Preliminary School Budget

The school board approved a preliminary budget with two additional questions.

 

The Board of Education of the School District of the Chathams approved a preliminary budget for the 2013-14 school year which includes a 2.6 percent increase on the local tax levy and a second and third question for the voters in April.

The estimated expenditures for the school district in the 2013-14 school year total $65,131,110. With a tax increase of 2.6 percent, the total amount to be collected through local taxes will be $55,409,233.

At this rate the average borough household would pay an additional $209.90 throughout the year, or $17.49 per month. The average township household would pay an additional $17.06 per month or $204.75 over the year.

This proposed budget pays for additional staffing and extracurricular activities in the district. It does not pay for safety and security increases, which emerged as a priority for this budget after the school shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. in December.

Superintendent Dr. Michael LaSusa proposes a two-pronged approach to school security. First he recommends increasing school counselors to one per elementary school (currently Washington Avenue School and Milton Avenue School share a counselor), a student assistant counselor at Chatham Middle School and one more counselor at Chatham High School.

These additional staffing requests make up one additional question for the budget and total $240,000 for the year.

The second approach is for additional security personnel. This includes a director of Safety and Security, and morning and afternoon monitors at each school building.

This request will total $225,000 for the year.

LaSusa said these improvements will bring Chatham more in-line with security at other schools. Even after last year's installation of cameras and swipe-card access, LaSusa said, "I have never been in a high school with as little security as we have."

A table showing the impact of the budget and two additional questions are below.

Revenue Percentage Increase
Tax Levy for Base Budget $65,131,110 2.6%
Tax Levy for Question #1 $240,000
Tax Levy for Base Budget plus Question #1 $65,371,110 3.04%
Tax Levy for Question #2 $225,000
Tax Levy for Base Budget plus Question #2 $65,356,110 3.02$
Total Tax Levy (Base Budget plus Question #1 and 2) $65,596,110 3.46%

In former years, second questions needed a super majority—60 percent—of votes to pass. Now they require only 50 percent of votes in the polls, plus one.

Maximum Allowable Tax Increase

LaSusa said the district qualifies for a health care adjustment over the 2 percent state tax levy cap, plus banked cap from the last three years which cannot be touched until the full health care allowance has been used. The district will not lose any banked cap this year.

The table below shows the total allowable tax increase for the district, including banked cap and exceptions for rising health care costs.

2% Tax Levy Increase from 2012-13 Budget $1,080,102
Health Care Cost Adjustment $634,098
Banked Cap $517,409
Maximum Allowable Tax Levy Increase $2,231,609
Maximum Percentage of Tax Increase 4.13%

High School Expansion

The budget also includes about $3 million for capital improvements, including paving projects at multiple schools and the addition of four new classrooms at Chatham High School. These funds will come from the capital reserve, not from additional taxes.

Chatham High finished an expansion project in 2012 which put in four new classrooms, plus walking paths from the school to Lafayette Avenue. The rooms were set to open earlier but construction was delayed due to Hurricane Irene and the damage from the October 2011 snow storm.

The classrooms have a maximum capacity of about 100 students, enough to contain the high school's student population until about 2015. Enrollment at the high school is set to continue to rise, according to a demographer's report. For that reason, the four classrooms were constructed with the ability to put a second floor on top with four more classrooms.

State Aid

While state aid did remain flat at $1,871,941, the state increased a debt assessment fee which lowers net aid by $65,000. Also, LaSusa said there is still no indication of how sequestration cuts will affect the budget.

Related Topics: 2013-14 school budget, School District Of The Chathams, School Elections, School Security, Second Question, Superintendent Michael LaSusa, and safe schools

R. Swanson

11:21 am on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

3.46%? Really? The second and third questions need to be defeated outright, and the budget itself needs to be examined by taxpayers carefully before being approved in Chatham's typical rubber stamp fashion. Once again, Chatham's Board of Education and Superintendent fail to see the adverse impact on the community from the never ending upward spiral in property taxes. The legislature needs to eliminate the concept of "banked cap" altogether, or else property tax caps mean absolutely nothing to decision makers who apparently can't say not to more and more spending.

Reply

kjchat

12:05 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

outrageous, with the proposed increase in the borough municipal budget this is going to be a 5-6% property tax increase again...

Reply

L22

4:43 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Agreed, R. Swanson. People need to remember that voting NO does NOT mean that one does not support the Chatham schools. It means that there are better ways for this board to work with the taxpayers' money. The relentless increases, year after year, are ridiculous. Why not for one year, to show at least evidence of good faith, try to hold the line and keep taxes flat? And why are the extracurricular activities not up for a vote- why is that expense a given? Any justification? They have set this up to scare people into voting for a larger tax increase over security concerns. How about put the extracurricular activities off and put that money into security?

Reply

Biff

8:33 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Adverse impact on the community?!!! The Chatham Bd of Ed and Dr.
LsSusa do an amazing job, with their success continually driving real estate prices higher and higher, far exceeding the meager increase in school taxes. Chatham school taxes are in the middle of the pack as % of RE value, but rank among the very top in terms of achievement. Also, generous Chatham residents do a fabulous job of supporting the various sports and arts boosters, as well as the Chatham Education Foundation. In other communities, the taxes get hit with cost that are picked up by concerned and generous donors in Chatham. If lower taxes is all you are concerned about, there are plenty of buntings more than happy to pay our tax rate. Smart, aware residents know that supporting our schools and passing the budget is one of the smartest decisions and investments they could possibly make!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

R. Swanson

11:26 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Smart, aware residents don't assume that more spending equals educational excellence, and wouldn't provide a blank check for the school district to spend under the assumption that it keeps property values high. There are diminishing returns in that property taxes get to a point where they actually start to harm home values. The notion that "meager" increases are acceptable is short sighted. Through the power of compounding, even meager increases over a decade result a substantial spike in taxes. There are many reasons why Chatham's students excel - the schools are only part of the reason, and anyone who has put kids through the Chatham schools is fully aware of the money spent on tutors, Kumon, SAT/ACT prep to supplement what is at times a mediocre job done by Chatham's schools. Chatham's administrators don't have a magic success formula - when you add up the extra help parents pay for, Chatham's schools are just as expensive as anywhere else.

Comment_arrow

L22

9:32 am on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Really? Not sure there has been a skyrocketing in real estate values over the past few years. Maybe Chatham didn't see the steep decline other towns did. Someday, people will wise up to this argument and realize - again- that spending more every year, year after year, is not necessarily better, or even necessary.

Comment_arrow

kjchat

9:39 am on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

perhaps you should read up on West Orange and the impact that runaway property taxes has had on the value, and ability to sell one's homes there...

Comment_arrow

Tom

12:35 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Well said R. Swanson
And Biff - (JN) if a BOE member is weighing in they should identify themselves as such

Don D

10:10 pm on Tuesday, March 12, 2013

All I have to say is this town needs to stop spending like it has a never ending check book. Whats next, promote the balance of the CBPD to the rank of sergeant?

Reply

R. Swanson

6:04 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

If this forum were represenative of the vote in April, a clear message would be sent to the Board of Education. The views here need to be translated into "no" votes to have impact. Let's make it happen, folks!

Reply

Jtace

6:55 pm on Wednesday, March 13, 2013

R. Swanson and L22 - yes, right on. With two children in the Chatham school district myself, I can vouch for the fact that although our schools are of good quality, they are not the be-all end-all in education, and as R. Swanson points out, essentially everyone I know with kids in this school district also pays (and pays well, I might add) for outside tutoring. I can't say our experience in the schools has been exceptional, and I'm tired of forking over more and more cash every year for the same thing. Face it, there are a significant number of teachers in this district who are average or below-average.

Reply

Leave a comment