patching...
Breaking: Water Line Break Closes Intersection »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Parents: Delayed Openings Cause Hardship to Some

Parents complain about five delayed openings, LaSusa says a solution is coming soon.

 

When the School District of the Chathams approved the calendar for the 2011-12 academic year, it exchanged one full inservice day for five delayed openings throughout the year.

The first is on Friday, Oct. 28, with the remaining dates on Dec. 2, Feb. 3, April 27 and June 1, all Fridays.

Dr. Michael LaSusa, the assistant superintendent in the district, said new regulations from the state include several mandatory two-hour training sessions, such as a training on the new anti-bullying policy (which staff will attend Monday), two-hour training on suicide prevention and a new model of professional development from the state level, which involved regular meetings throughout the school year for staff "to work on school-wide goals relating to student achievement," LaSusa said in an email to Chatham Patch.

These come in addition to department meetings, faculty meetings, grade-level meetings and team meetings, as well as any other state-mandated training, according to LaSusa.

"We believed that more recurring time in our calendar devoted to professional development was necessary," LaSusa said. "We felt that a stand-alone day in the spring was not sufficient to fully and best implement the obligations the state has placed upon us."

On the scheduled inservice days, schools will open two hours late, as they would when weather causes a delayed opening. The result, LaSusa said, will be for teachers to meet the state's requirements "without a material reduction in instructional time."

Nicole McGuire, a Chatham Borough resident whose daughter attends Milton Avenue School, teaches full-time in Union and her husband also works full-time. Her father often takes care of her daughter before school before he, too, goes to work.

She said the prospect of finding before-school care for her daughter is a financial hardship, and taking time off of work is not a possibility. She also said she did not think there was adequate notice of the delayed openings, since she did not see the first one until she turned her school calendar to October.

"When I contacted Work Family Connection, there were no plans for any childcare," McGuire said. She also said the parent liaison was unaware of the change. "The economy's changing. ... It's getting near the end of the year. You have concerns that you have end-of-the-year deadlines, and employers are going to be looking at Friday [attendance and punctuality.]"

While some families have one parent who stays at home, McGuire said among the moms she knows several have returned to work recently. "I think with this economy, people are having to go back to work," she said. "That change needs to be addressed."

McGuire said she reached out to LaSusa, who responded that school administrators negotiated the five delayed openings with teachers for this year and they would consider making a change for the following year. When Chatham Patch reached out to him via email, he said Thursday the district hopes to have a solution for parents by the end of next week.

"We certainly recognize that this creates ... [days which are] not typical and [require] alternative arrangements for parents. We also recognize that this poses a larger problem for those parents who do not have other options for child care on the mornings of the delayed openings," LaSusa said.

Michael Farr, the site coordinator for Work Family Connection for the district and several other area districts, emailed Chatham Patch after this article was published. He said he and LaSusa had recently reached an arrangement for all parents not currently enrolled with Work Family Connection to participate in child care on the inservice days. The cost is $15 for before school care and $25 for after school care per day, plus a registration fee. He also said there will be no additional cost for those families already enrolled with Work Family Connection.

Related Topics: Delayed Openings, School District Of The Chathams, and Teacher Inservices
What would be an ideal solution for the delayed openings in Chatham schools? Tell us in the comments.

Nicole McGuire

6:30 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

ALL districts must meet these same requirements and are not doing it with delayed openings and inconveniencing the parents with the financial hardship of finding childcare five times a year. Two full day in-service for teachers with two hour training slots. Teachers already had two days before school even started and have one on Columbus day. The State requires 20 hours = 100 hours within 5 years.

Reply

Hugh Topian

7:01 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

The assumption in Chatham has always been that one parent can afford to stay home.

Reply
Comment_arrow

llbxy

9:49 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

You are absolutely right on that.

For those who are surprised about the short notice, there have been instances in the past where a delayed opening (which was for administrative purposes and not weather related) was announced the DAY BEFORE.

R. Swanson

9:30 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

Agree that 5 delayed openings is a ridiculous way to deal with state mandated training. Full days would have been more efficient and would have allowed parents to make child care arrangements. That being said, schools shouldn't be viewed as daycare, either - parents need to make arrangements to have their kids taken care of, whether it means hiring a babysitter, one parent taking a vacation day, or some other arrangement.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CoffeeLover

5:46 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I totally agree that school should not be viewed as childcare and parents need to make arrangements, but with this type of scheduling it is extremely difficult to find child care. Thank goodness for Work Family. In addition, it is not just once, but five times and all on Friday's, which makes it even harder. Many companies look at whether or not you consistently take off on a Friday or a Monday. I think that the bottom line is, "schools and home must work collaboratively to find a suitable solution".

Duncan Munchkin

9:34 am on Friday, October 7, 2011

I, too, was shocked when I first looked at the school calendar and saw these repeat delayed openings. This issue won't affect me as much as most others, but it still strikes me as a poorly thought out, half-baked approach to providing more training.

I am glad Ms. McGuire is able to inform us about this issue from a parent AND teacher's perspective. I think it is an understatement from Patch to say that this will only affect some. For instance, the Kindergarten program (which is already tremendously weak in my opinion) alternates on these days so that only AM or PM attends.

Reply

Baron

2:47 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

The Board of Education publishes the School District calendar over a year in advance! As a parent in the district, I note all the applicable dates in my personal calendar prior to the beginning of school so that my husband and I have all delayed openings, vacations, etc covered and planned for. The BOE spends alot of time to create a calendar that has the required 180 days plus snow days, state mandated training days, AND they solicit feedback from the parents. Most parents don't prefer to have their children miss more days of school, which interferes with the learning and retention of information, nor do they want their children in school until the end of June. Thus the delayed openings were created. The school calendars are posted online at www.chatham-nj.org. And if you are interested in assisting the BOE with the creation of future school calendars, please feel free to attend the BOE meetings. The meeting dates are also posted on the www.chatham-nj.org website.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CoffeeLover

5:29 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I think parents are only asking for common courtesy. The only people benefitting from this schedule are the staff, because they do not have to put in any additional hours to meet the state requirements. By the time the students arrive at school, settle in, have lunch, take a spelling test and have a "special" it is time to go home. Missing only one day is much more beneficial.
I think it is wonderful that you and your husband have the type of jobs that allow you to miss five Fridays or come in late on five Fridays. Where do you work? I want to apply!
I would LOVE to attend a board meeting, but it is difficult when I am a working mother and raising a child with a disability that requires therapy after school and often evenings. You are assuming that everyone has a schedule that allows them to come to these meetings. and that is quite presumptuous on your part.
Maybe Mrs. McGuire should be on the board. The calendar is voted upon and I do not recall the choice of in-service time discussed. I am sorry if I am wrong. In addition, the board meeting that decided this was in the spring. That is not a year s notice, as you stated. I was not aware to look for ridiculous changes. When a significant change is going to be made notify us. We receive flyers almost on a regular basis asking for donations. Why not send an informative notice letting us know of the upcoming change in the calendar? Not only did Mrs. McGuire not notice, but neither did many others.

Comment_arrow

Baron

6:02 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

CoffeeLover: Your level of frustration is coming through loud & clear. Regardless of where my husband & I work, I was merely trying to point out that this information IS AVAILABLE online. Many families plan in advance for coverage (either with sitters or with friends/neighbors). My 4 children have many different types of sports activities and medical issues that require juggling our time. It takes planning and it takes a village. I believe we are fortunate to live in a great community like Chatham where my neighbors and I can trade before or after care and where our school district and BOE works hard to provide a reasonable calendar. Unless you would rather your children be in school until July 1st....which would be the option if you added an additional 5 days to the school calendar. But then, maybe that would solve childcare during the summer for some working parents. Personally, I prefer my children to have a summer holiday and enjoy a nice break! If you are interested in attending the BOE meetings, you are more than invited. I am not being presumptious to invite people to the BOE meetings. Those people who have opinions and want to voice their opinions in a manner where they will be heard, should make the time and effort to attend the meetings. Otherwise, you are simply venting on a blog...

Comment_arrow

Sunshine

9:47 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Coffeelover, don't forget that the little ones will also have recess after lunch. Yes, here are five very productive days. Whether or not it was on the calendar doesn't appear to truly be the issue. I think the issue is that it does not appear to have been very well thought out as being productive. I think the most important thing here is to remember what is most important for the students and not the teachers. It appears the teachers may have agreed upon a contract of only 183 days therfore the district had to take away from student instructional time to accomodate the contract given.

CoffeeLover

6:09 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

We wouldn't be adding five days, we would add one day. This would not bring us to July 1st. This is how it has been in years past. Students had a day off in March, which was a great time to give them a break! One day is easier to cover than five. I am so glad it works out for you, because between my family and friends when childcare was discussed we got nothing. In addition, you are not a single mom.

Reply

CoffeeLover

6:12 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

PS I don't think you are hearing frustration as much as being infuriated.

Reply

Sunshine

7:01 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

When I hear about this from a friend I was completely taken back. I did not see this on the sample calendars so I wasn't looking for a change. All I can say is, "Thank you Mrs. McGuire". Getting child care available has been a blessing for us. I was completely panicked! Now I can relax knowing my children are safe and my job will not be upset with me missing so much time. I don't have anyone else to rely on this year. Many of my friends are back to work. I am very grateful. I truly hope this is not the new trend. God Bless you.

Reply

Anonymous

8:10 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Calendars are released at least a year in advance. If you look at the school district's website, the 2012-2013 calendar is already available, and has been for some time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sunshine

9:08 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

How was this released a year in advance when the decision to have these delayed openings was decided at the spring board meeting?

Comment_arrow

Nicole McGuire

12:22 am on Sunday, October 16, 2011

The calendar was modified at the May 23, 2011 board meeting. Here are the minutes. Once again, if an modification was made the parents should have been notified. The calendar I printed out and have on my refrigerator is not the same as the one that is now in place for this year. I believe that the parents are owed an apology and people should stop hiding behind the quote "Calendars are released at least a year in advance".
Upon the motion of Trustee Connors, seconded by Trustee Nonnenmacher, the board considered the
following motion:
RESOLUTION (054-11/12)—RESOLVED, upon the recommendation of the Superintendent,
that the School District of the Chathams Board of Education, in the County of Morris, New
Jersey approves modifying the 2011-12 school calendar to reflect additional student day and
addition of 5 delayed openings for professional development. (Attachment F-2)
A roll call vote was taken.
YEA – Barna, Burgunder, Gilfillan, Nonnenmacher, Weber, Connors, and Belding
NAY – None
The motion carried 7-0.
BOARD BUSINESS

Sir

8:32 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Transparency and full disclosure. Not fine print. When something is changed, such as the dress code, it was very well communicated. This was hidden because of the outrage it might cause. Aren't we in the 21st century and can't this be an online training session the teachers can take either just before school, during a break or just after? Or here is a novel idea. The 3 months they are off in the summer might be a good time for the training.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Wills

9:49 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

The State has a two hour training video for bullying and harrassing. I hope the teachers are not just viewing the video. I know substitues and teachers that stated they had to view the video and sign off as their inservice. Questions were asked at their staff meetings.

Sunshine

9:06 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

Kudos to you Jerry! My sentiments exactly. I could not have said it better myself! Unfortunately, teacher training cannot be done online or in the summer, but I am surprised they have not had the Bullying and Harassing training or Suicide Prevention on one of the two days before school started. What trainings were moreimportant than the Bullying and Harassing or the Suicide Prevention? Teachers can also take professional days. The Learning Resource Center in Morristown offers teacher trainings for $11.

Reply

B. A. La Puma

11:51 pm on Friday, October 7, 2011

I may be considered naive, but since when is it the schools job to provide child care. I don't think my tax dollars should be concerned about anyone's baby sitting needs. I am concerned that teachers are well prepared. Five two hour periods should not be so impossible to cover. I hope you have a plan for when your child is ill, or do you send him to school anyway because you can't get some one to care for him? What will you do on snow days? Jobs do provide workers with annual leave if that is the only solution. Why not think outside of the box and try the senior citizen center--perhaps someone would love to be a grand parent for a few hours. I have worked full time in NYC with two kids and guess what, their care was my responsibility. With two people working, ten hours of baby sitting expense a year should not be such a financial hardship. Further, why should more money and time be spent on flyers when you have the calendar and should look at it. Why is it always someone else who is wrong when someone does not meet his/her responsibility to read the info.? Why should folks have to be spoon fed? Sure, we are all very busy. Yes, jobs are important and one needs to hold on tight, but children are a parent's responsibility and their care is not the schools responsibility. I am sure that some thought went into the calendar. Really how much notice does someone need? Would you really line up a babysitter in April for Oct.? Be proactive. Get involved in the planning.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sunshine

8:43 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

I think you are naive if you are thinking that people use school as babysitters. You should be more concerned that your tax dollars are paying for a lack of academics for five days. Chatham just got five days in on the calendar and dooped you. Academics are usually taught in the morning. Working parents, which it seems you have no understanding of, utilize their time off for when their children are ill. Working parents do not neglect their children as you are inferring. It is an assumption that all parents in Chatham are stay at homes, as yourself, have cleaning people and full time help. There are single mothers struggling in this economy, fighting to get their child support or half the money for childcare. For these parents every penny counts. .According to the article Mrs. McGuire was speaking on behalf of individuals in the community not only herself. Folks are not spoon fed, but you took away their SOURCE of childcare and put their jobs at risk. What your asking is for working parents to leave their children with WHOEVER just so we can go to work? As others said, even if the info was found out earlier how do you go about finding someone to babysit your child for only five days and can it cannot be a teenager when you need your child taken to school. I did not hear you volunteering your services to assist. Your just a venting person that doesn't have a clue what it is like for working families.

Comment_arrow

Joe

11:12 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Yes, I agree, LaPuma. Get creative. Why don't you tell parents to solicit childcare outside of ShopRite? (Please never do that!) What you are suggesting is EXTREMELY dangerous and yes they are the parents responsibility and keep them safe is of the utmost importance. Don't you care who you leave your children with? If so, why don't you care about the safety of other people's children? Your posting sounds as if you resent working parents. I am sure if you worked full time in NYC you probably had someone come into the house FT and delayed openings wouldn't be your concern. Taking an annual leave will also create a financial hardship. Go paperless or instant alert of significant changes. I too have a lot of wasted paper used up asking me for donations and for fundraisers, so why don't you make the same recommendation to those committees instead of bashing working parents concerns? Please consider safe solutions before we read in the Patch about a tragedy happening because a parent had unsafe childcare during the delayed openings.

Comment_arrow

BRL

10:57 pm on Sunday, October 9, 2011

EEEWWWW! Why don't you spoon feed yourself a nice heaping spoonful of compassion! What a disgrace.

Nicole McGuire

12:12 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

First of all, I want to say that I do not hide behind a pseudonym, because when I speak I acknowledge that these are my words. I am very glad to hear that the child care situation has been rectified and I thank Chatham Patch for allowing me to bring this to the community’s attention when unable to reach a resolution with Dr. LaSusa. Whether or not we saw the change last year, it would not have made a difference in the situation. I hope that in the future the district will look into a more effective way of communicating and collaborative with the parents.
One thing that I strongly believe we must acknowledge is the fact that the teachers did not play a part in creating the calendar. I have come across some outstanding professionals during my child's education (and they know who they are) and for their hard work and dedication I am forever grateful.
Baron, thank you for the invitation. I am also a University Professor and have seminars scheduled. This part of my career is extremely important, because it allows me to reach out to future educators and develop their understandings of an effective inclusive classroom by providing them with the knowledge of 504, IDEA laws and regs. I help my students learn how to develop effective strategies and advocate for all children and their families so that they can go forward and provide the same quality education and maintain the same high standards that I hold in teaching and have experienced in Chatham.

Reply

jdb

10:09 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

Is there a good reason why 2-hour training sessions can't be conducted after school? 3:30-5:30 or 4:00-6:00 wouldn't impact the school day and doesn't seem like a terrible inconvenience for teachers and staff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Wills

9:53 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

I have to say, there is a state training video that is two hours long for Bullying and Harrassing. You view the video and sign off. I do know many teachers that did these training after school, because their contracts permitted them to stay until 5:00 or 5:30 once a week. I hope they are doing more than watching a video to take away from the children's instructional time.

Sugarandspice

10:26 am on Saturday, October 8, 2011

It seems the people that are angry about this article are the ones that are not effected by childcare issues and indicate that "it is not their problem and school is not childcare." This is not a very nice attitude, because then we see how are children are developing to be self-center individuals. Instead of reaching out to their fellow parents and offering assistance I hear criticisms and no one knows what someone is going through unless you have been in their shoes. Good child care is almost virtually impossible to find for the type of hours that the school is looking for and it is easier to get a sitter if children were given half days. Putting your job at risk can create a financial hardship for anyone and I am glad to see that LaPuma was able to quite her job and be a stay at home mom so she no longer has to worry about child care assistance. Reaching out to strangers at a senior citizen center is not something I would recommend. That is like stopping someone on the street and asking if they could watch your child. Also, paperless, e-mails and newsletters from the school is a great way to contact parents with no cost(so get creative LaPuma) and yes they do spend the money on flyers asking for donations.
I questions, if we did not meet the benchmarks for NCLB should we even risk losing any instructional time? It may be a "flawed law" but it still is a law.
Mrs. McGuire makes a lot of sense and your tax dollars are not paying for WF.

Reply

llbxy

12:26 pm on Saturday, October 8, 2011

It is true that the calendar is posted well in advance, however, the district doesn't always stick to what's on the calendar. As I posted above, there have been instances where the delayed opening was announced the day before (and again, not weather related). Yesterday, a delayed opening was announced for 9th graders on October 12. That delayed opening is NOT on the published district calendar.

Obviously that's a minor inconvenience compared to delayed openings in elementary schools, because 9th graders don't need childcare, but some do need rides to school, and since it's only for 9th graders it messes up carpool arrangements with older students.

Reply

Nicole McGuire

9:32 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

After reading LaPuma's statement that "people don't plan in April for October" or Anonymous stating "the calendar is out for 2012 -2013", I realized how this confusion occurred. I print the calendar in December for the following year. My husband plans his vacation time around days I do not have off that match the calendar. If it was modified in the spring I was unaware and working off an old calendar. Again, there should have been notification of a modification. I do think that next year the issue that instructional time is taken away from the students should be addressed.
LaPuma, when I stated about a "financial hardship" I was talking about working parents in general. One mother told me she was able to take the five half days off, but would be docked in pay because it was a new job.
I don't think people realize the networking of phone calls, e-mails and texts circulating because of the lack of childcare. I also want you to know that I have NEVER sent my child to school sick and did miss 16 days of work last year due to her excessive illnesses. She is my number one priority. Snow days and holidays, when I am home, I have a house full of children of many working parents and take them sledding. In addition, I sit for children on the weekend of working parents and when they have off during the week they in turn assist me. We are creative, but our resources ran dry without work family. I would NEVER EVER leave my child with a stranger.

Reply

LeAnn Tavtigian

11:11 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Perhaps they should consider early dismissal rather than a delayed opening. Early dismissals are easier on parents for a couple of reasons:

1. In an early dismissal, the older kids are dismissed first. So high school and middle school students are available to watch younger siblings or neighbors. In a delayed opening, they still go into school first and are not available to help.

2. It is generally easier to find afternoon babysitters than morning babysitters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Wills

11:51 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Absolutely and the morning is used for instructional time. Students go home for lunch and recess. In addition, while the elementary schools have half days for conferences, the middle school and HS could have half days and do some of their trainings. If a survey went out explaining the situation maybe half days would have shown to be more effective. Every district in the state of NJ is in the same boat. Chatham is not alone. I think it goes back to assuming most are stay at home moms and someone is automatically available for any changes in schedules. I work for a school district that is just the opposite, so we always consider options that would be available for working parents.

LeAnn Tavtigian

11:25 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

Another option that I forgot to mention before is to keep the kids in school and bring in substitute teachers to run the classes while the teachers rotate through the training. Summit did this on Friday and each sub was able to cover for two teachers while the teachers took turns going to the training.

Reply

Tim Wills

11:54 am on Sunday, October 9, 2011

We have done this too. It worked out very well and the students remained on task because they knew the teachers were right in the buildings. We even had teachers on their preps cover one another. It is an excellent option. Win win for all.

Reply

Leave a comment