patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Report: Chatham High Improves Proficiency in HSPA Tests

State DOE report cards were released Thursday.

 

 

The School District of the Chathams has continued its reputation for excellence, according to the 2010-11 state Department of Education report cards released Thursday.

The goal of the School Report Cards is to allow the public to see how the state judges individual elementary, middle and high schools' performance in the 2010-11 school year. The information can be used to find deficiencies and plot courses for improvement. 

The reports measure standardized test scores for each school in a district and also provides figures on average class size, expulsion rate, length of instruction time, attendance rate and several other factors.

It also provides financial data for districts. Together, the Chathams fund 90 percent of the budget through taxes, while the state average is 52 percent. Per pupil spending costs in the Chathams are $15,428, less than neighbor Madison, whose cost per pupil is $17,130, and less than the state average of $17,469.

Total cot per pupil in the district for the 2010-11 year was $15,428, compared to a state average, rising from $14,825 in the 2009-10 year, according to last year's school report card data.

The Chathams only receives 9 percent in state aid while the state average is 42 percent.

The Chatham High School Class of 2011 had a 96.83 percent graduation rate. According to the High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA) tests, Chatham High raised its percentage rates of "Advanced Proficiency" in both literature and mathematics over the 2009-10 scores.

The percentage of students who entered and left during the school year fell to almost zero, from 2.5 percent in 2009-10 to 0.7 percent in 2010-11.

Class sizes in Chatham High School remain below the state average at every grade level. The number of students per faculty member is 12.3, compared to a state average of 11.

School suspensions totaled 1 percent at Chatham High and within the district, compared to a 13 percent suspension rate throughout the state.

The report card also shows juniors and seniors from the 2010-11 school year had a 100 percent participation rate in Advanced Placement (AP) classes, though this is an error, according to Interim Superintendent Dennis Fyffe. The actual percentage of juniors and seniors who took AP classes is 67 percent.

You can find breakdowns of the individual elementary schools and grade levels on the DOE website.

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK4)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
308
299
18.5%
19.1%
70.8%
68.9%
10.7%
12%
District 2010-11
2009-10
308
299
18.5%
19.1%
70.8%
68.9%
10.7%
12%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4341
4366
15.1%
15.9%
67.7%
62.9%
17.2%
21.2%
State 2010-11
2009-10
100447
101654
36.7%
40.2%
56%
50.4%
7.3%
9.3%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK4)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
309
299
7.4%
9%
61.2%
48.8%
31.4%
42.1%
District 2010-11
2009-10
309
299
7.4%
9%
61.2%
48.8%
31.4%
42.1%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4352
4377
6%
6.8%
38.6%
34.6%
55.3%
58.6%
State 2010-11
2009-10
100776
102032
20%
22.8%
47.5%
42.3%
32.5%
34.9%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK4)
SCIENCE
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
308
298
1.9%
0%
31.2%
39.6%
66.9%
60.4%
District 2010-11
2009-10
308
298
1.9%
0%
31.2%
39.6%
66.9%
60.4%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4350
4376
2.3%
1%
27.6%
34.3%
70.1%
64.7%
State 2010-11
2009-10
100720
102004
9.6%
6.5%
42.3%
49.2%
48.2%
44.3%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK5)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
289
335
11.4%
6.3%
71.6%
68.4%
17%
25.4%
District 2010-11
2009-10
289
335
11.4%
6.3%
71.6%
68.4%
17%
25.4%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4413
4504
13.3%
12.9%
69.6%
62.8%
17.2%
24.3%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101075
102415
38.6%
36.7%
55.2%
54.5%
6.2%
8.8%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK5)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
289
336
3.8%
4.2%
31.1%
38.4%
65.1%
57.4%
District 2010-11
2009-10
289
336
3.8%
4.2%
31.1%
38.4%
65.1%
57.4%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4423
4521
4.1%
5.4%
27.7%
30.1%
68.2%
64.6%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101377
102732
19%
21%
41.2%
42.1%
39.8%
36.9%
New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK6)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
341
313
7.9%
8.3%
77.1%
66.5%
15%
25.2%
District 2010-11
2009-10
341
314
7.9%
8.3%
77.1%
66.6%
15%
25.2%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4496
4442
10.8%
10.9%
70%
67.3%
19.2%
21.8%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101922
102281
32.8%
34.5%
59.9%
57.9%
7.4%
7.6%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK6)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
342
314
4.7%
7.6%
41.8%
39.8%
53.5%
52.5%
District 2010-11
2009-10
342
315
4.7%
7.6%
41.8%
39.7%
53.5%
52.7%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4512
4449
5.7%
8.6%
40%
42.8%
54.3%
48.7%
State 2010-11
2009-10
102218
102558
22.1%
27.9%
50%
48.5%
27.9%
23.6%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK7)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
314
304
8.9%
5.6%
56.7%
51.6%
34.4%
42.8%
District 2010-11
2009-10
314
304
8.9%
5.6%
56.7%
51.6%
34.4%
42.8%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4362
4502
11.9%
7.6%
57.3%
52.2%
30.9%
40.2%
State 2010-11
2009-10
102032
102516
36.1%
30.5%
51.5%
51.9%
12.5%
17.6%
New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK7)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
315
304
12.4%
10.2%
37.1%
43.1%
50.5%
46.7%
District 2010-11
2009-10
315
304
12.4%
10.2%
37.1%
43.1%
50.5%
46.7%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4373
4525
11.8%
11.4%
36.5%
39.4%
51.8%
49.2%
State 2010-11
2009-10
102243
102752
33.7%
35.4%
41.7%
40.1%
24.6%
24.5

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK8)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
303
275
1.7%
1.5%
52.5%
57.1%
45.9%
41.5%
District 2010-11
2009-10
303
275
1.7%
1.5%
52.5%
57.1%
45.9%
41.5%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4502
4317
3.2%
3.3%
53.9%
54.2%
43%
42.5%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101757
102168
17.2%
17.1%
63.4%
64.4%
19.4%
18.5%

 

National Assessment Educational Progress (NAEP)
GRADE 8 READING
YearProficiency Percentages
Below
Basic
Basic Proficient Advanced
State (NJ) 2011 15.8% 39.5% 38.6% 6.2%
Nation 2011 25.3% 43.0% 28.6% 3.0%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK8)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
303
275
9.2%
8%
38.3%
37.5%
52.5%
54.5%
District 2010-11
2009-10
303
275
9.2%
8%
38.3%
37.5%
52.5%
54.5%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4503
4327
9.3%
9.7%
34%
33.9%
56.7%
56.4%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101833
102161
27.9%
31%
41.4%
39.7%
30.8%
29.3%

 

National Assessment Educational Progress (NAEP)
GRADE 8 MATHEMATICS
YearProficiency Percentages
Below
Basic
Basic Proficient Advanced
State (NJ) 2011 17.8% 35.3% 33.2% 13.6%
Nation 2011 27.7% 38.8% 25.7% 7.8%

 

New Jersey Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (NJASK8)
SCIENCE
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced
School 2010-11
2009-10
303
274
2.6%
1.5%
37%
39.1%
60.4%
59.5%
District 2010-11
2009-10
303
274
2.6%
1.5%
37%
39.1%
60.4%
59.5%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
4499
4323
3.8%
3%
39.7%
37.1%
56.6%
59.9%
State 2010-11
2009-10
101769
102161
18.2%
16.6%
52.2%
51.7%
29.6%
31.6%

 

High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA)
LANGUAGE ARTS LITERACY
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced







District 2010-11
2009-10
294
240
1%
1.7%
44.9%
53.3%
54.1%
45%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
3869
3722
2.5%
2.2%
51.5%
54.4%
46.1%
43.4%
State 2010-11
2009-10
95035
96852
9.6%
12%
69.3%
69.3%
21.2%
18.7%
High School Proficiency Assessment (HSPA)
MATHEMATICS
YearNumber
Tested
Proficiency Percentages
Partial Proficient Advanced







District 2010-11
2009-10
294
240
7.8%
6.6%
37.8%
39.2%
54.4%
54.2%
DFG 2010-11
2009-10
15448
15539
10.8%
10.3%
45.5%
46.7%
43.7%
43%
State 2010-11
2009-10
94942
96761
23.8%
25%
50.5%
50.7%
25.7%
24.3%

 

Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) Results
  Students
Taking Test
Mathematics Verbal Essay
  # % Average
Score
Percentile Scores Average
Score
Percentile Scores Average
Score
Percentile Scores
25th 50th 75th 25th 50th 75th 25th 50th 75th
2010-11  
School 228 78% 588 520 600 665 569 505 565 640 591 520 600 660
DFG 3533 91% 607 530 610 680 580 510 580 650 591 520 590 670
State 71195 73% 518 440 510 600 494 420 490 570 496 420 490 570
2009-10  
School 224 92% 598 520 600 660 577 510 580 645 595 520 600 650
DFG 3428 92% 606 530 610 690 577 510 580 650 588 520 590 660
State 65673 66% 520 440 510 600 496 420 490 570 499 420 490 580
2008-09  
School 196 96% 598 530 605 670 580 515 580 650 585 520 590 660
DFG 3145 87% 608 540 620 680 580 510 580 660 587 510 590 670
State 63618 63% 515 430 510 600 494 410 490 570 494 410 490 570

 

 

Editor's note: A previous version of this article stated 100 percent of the juniors and seniors from the 2010-11 school year took Advanced Placement classes. This information was reported on the DOE's School Report Card. However, Interim Superintendent Dennis Fyffe said this is an error. The actual percentage is 67. Chatham Patch has corrected the error and apologizes to our readers.

Related Topics: 2010-11 School Report Cards and School District Of The Chathams

Duncan Munchkin

2:03 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

Okay wait. If Chatham schools are 12.3 students per faculty member and the state average is 11 students per faculty member then we are actually worse--like more crowded...get it? You forgot to mention how Chatham failed to beat the DFG average in nearly every single percentile for SATs. Our SAT scores do not beat the AVERAGE of our district financial group. Excellence..where? In lack of mobility? :(

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chatham Resident

6:23 am on Saturday, June 2, 2012

I don't know anything about the DFG/SAT stats, but, Class size vs. students/faculty appear to be two different stats. I assume the difference is that there are fewer administrative positions leaving more staff to teach, making the student to staff ratio higher, but the student to teacher lower the average.

Leave a comment