patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Borough Residents Vote to Save Pool

Referendum to save Chatham Borough Municipal Pool passed by a margin of less than 500 votes.

 

Borough residents will have a municipal pool next summer.

Susan Caljean, the Chatham Borough Clerk, said voters opted for an increase in taxes to pay for renovations to the pool. The votes were 1,524 in favor, 1,041 opposed.

Chatham Patch spoke with over 30 voters Tuesday who refused to go on the record on their opinion about the pool. Council members Len Resto and John Holman were among those who declined to comment on the record. Council President and candidate Jim Collander said, "We need a large turnout as an indication of how people feel about the pool."

Resident Greg Lowe said after voting, "I don't know if there's enough interest in the pool [to support it]. I think it should be funded just by membership, not by taxes."

Voter Turnout

Poll workers in the township and the borough said voter turnout was higher than anticipated in Tuesday's midterm elections.

"They [the polls] were pretty busy," Caljean said. Township Clerk Gregory LaConte reported similarly high numbers of voters in that municipality. "I think they got a good turn-out," he said.

Polls in New Jersey closed at 8 p.m. Chatham Patch will post results as they become available.

Related Topics: Chatham Borough Municipal Pool and Election Results

jdb

10:36 pm on Tuesday, November 2, 2010

'A margin of less than 500 votes' is a pretty big margin when only 2,565 votes were cast. 60% of the voters wanted to invest in the pool. That's practically a landslide in politics. Good for Chatham.

Reply

sam

11:16 pm on Tuesday, November 2, 2010

The vote doesn't necessarily mean there will be a pool in the borough. It was not a spending referendum. Maybe the council will still find the insanity in spending $387,000 for the 100 people who use the pool.

Reply

Lisa Parks

8:56 am on Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Not everyone in Chatham can afford memberships to country clubs. More people would use the pool if it were updated.

Reply

R. Swanson

1:58 pm on Wednesday, November 3, 2010

This passed only because there was no organized effort to present the "No" viewpoint. Chatham residents apathetically gave this one to a small vocal minority of pool supporters. The vote was not truly representative. Spending $400k in this economy with 2% caps so that a couple of dozen people can have a place to swim is not a sensible use of public funds. The referendum was non-binding; now the Council needs to decide. Wake up people, and get to a Council meeting and let them know what you think. At a minimum pool fees should rise to cover the cost of the debt service.

Reply

barbara heimrich

5:04 pm on Wednesday, November 3, 2010

The vote was a clear message to the Council that a majority of people in the Boro want to save the pool. The cost of repairs and upgrades is less than $400k. Many of the funds are already in place as part of the Memorial Park upgrade project that has already been planned. My understanding is that there are also possible upgrades from the Shephard Kollack upgrades. I think that most people can afford $15.00 per year on their tax bill, especially to pay for something besides athletic fields and legal fees. Pool fees have indeed risen to help defray costs and, by the way, as of 2010 Township residents are able to join the pool, paying a slightly higher fee than Boro residents.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R. Swanson

9:09 am on Thursday, November 4, 2010

It is not for you or anyone to determine that most people can afford an extra $15 per year on their tax bill. Where does the line get drawn? An extra $10 here, and extra $15 there, and before you know it your property tax bill is significantly higher. This will be an albatross around the Borough's neck for years to come. $400,000 in debt (the Memorial Park and Sheppard Kollock funds are NOT available for this project - please check your facts and stop spreading disinformation) for a pool that will never be utilized anymore than it currently is. A couple of years from now, when it is running severely in the red factoring in debt service costs, anyone who voted "Yes" for this dog should be hit with a special tax assessment to cover the cost.

Leave a comment