patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Vacant Lots Discussion Postponed Amid Concerns

Neighbors say they would prefer to pay higher taxes and see the open space preserved.

 

As Chatham Borough officials evaluate six lots for potential development and sale, neighbors of at least one of the lots—83 Chatham St., at the southeast corner of Chatham Street and Lafayette Avenue—plan to protest any plan to build on the land.

Amanda and Mike Feeman live at 81 Chatham St., adjacent to the vacant lot.  Amanda Feeman said she plans to attend the Sept. 10 Chatham Borough Council meeting to make sure the council knows the potential negative impact of building on the lot at 83 Chatham St. The meeting was postponed from Monday night.

Niamh O'Byrne and Lisa Bussinelli live on Lafayette Avenue near the Chatham Street intersection. Like Feeman, both women are opposed to any sale of the lot for development.

The women object to the development partly because of traffic safety and the odd shape of the lot. To read about these objections, click here.

Tax Levy

Feeman said developing the lot for its potential impact on the municipal tax levy seems "shortsighted" to her. "They're focusing on the lots as a way to impact the local tax revenue, but what they're not thinking about is that if there's a house, people with children will move in," she said. "If those kids are going into the public schools, they'll add to the increase in school population, and that will eat into the tax revenue. ...

"I would rather pay increased taxes to care for the trees," Feeman said. "I feel that right now the town is making short-sighted decisions that are going to have long-term ramifications."

Buying and Selling

The Feemans are in the process of selling their house and moving to one around the corner on Watchung Avenue. The morning Chatham Patch published an article detailing the possible development of 83 Chatham St. and five other lots in the borough, Feeman said a buyer for her house backed out of the sale.

"It wasn't the only reason, but it was a reason," she said. "Now the second buyers are concerned about the potential construction, as well they should be. ... If you build on that lot, you're basically turning this into Center Street. ...

"But I'm not just concerned about this because I'm selling my house," Feeman said. "My kids are still going to live in this town. They're still going to have to walk this corner. I think it's a bad thing for the town, not just for this house."

A lot of similar size on the north corner of Lafayette Avenue and Chatham Street, across the street from 83 Chatham St., was deemed non-buildable and sold to the adjacent residents over 40 years ago. Feeman said she was willing to purchase the lot next to her house and asked DeNave for a price.

Purchasing the property would open up the potential for expanding the house at 81 Chatham St., which has three bedrooms and 1,800 square feet, according to Zillow.

"If we bought that lot, we could probably put on a den or a garage, maybe expand the driveway, but we wouldn't get another 1,700 square feet," Feeman said.

Auction

DeNave said each of the six vacant properties, including the lot on Chatham Street, could still be "auctioned as non-buildable lots to adjoining owners." He said, "More work [is] required to determine if they could be auctioned as building lots."

"If you have these adjacent properties, before you go doing something you should offer the lots to the people who live in the houses and give them a chance to buy them," Feeman said.

Further public discussion of the potential development on the six vacant lots has been postponed to the Chatham Borough Council meeting on Monday, Sept. 10.

"I believe it is important to have some more mapping prepared so that both the council and the public can better understand the intention and the process, should it move forward," DeNave said.

"I did receive a request from the owners of 83 Chatham St. with regard to purchasing the property some months ago, however, until the value of the property is established through this evaluation, the Council can not move forward," DeNave wrote in an email to Chatham Patch.

Additionally, DeNave said, "Only certain size properties qualify for direct sale. In the case of all that have been mentioned to date, I believe that auction is the only legal way to dispose of the property."

Related Topics: 83 Chatham St., Amanda Feeman, Lisa Bussinelli, Niamh O'Byrne, Potential Development, Vacant Lots in Chatham Borough, Vincent J. DeNave, and vacant lots

R. Swanson

9:10 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

If Ms. Feeman wants to pay higher taxes to preserve the open space and view next to her home, then the Borough Council should accomodate her and anyone else who objects to the auctioning off of buildable lots for selfish reasons. The Borough should not be owning buildable lots and they should be returned to the tax rolls ASAP. The impact on schools she sites will be negligible given the very small number of properties at play here; besides the school district would also benefit from the extra tax revenues. The Borough Council needs to do the right thing here for the benefit of the entire town and not just a few special interests who may have the view from their living rooms changes slightly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MOCK

6:33 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012

This and a couple of others have been deemed non-buildable lots. That is different from town-owned buildable lots. Just to keep that in mind during discussion.

Comment_arrow

ProfessorP

9:00 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

I think Mrs Freeman is saying is it would be better to raise taxes than to ruin the value of the area by building a house on a lot that is too small. The lot in her case is less then 50" wide with her house on one side and a sidewalk on the other, and at some point 150 plus or minus feet long. There is no way to maintain the set back on Lafayette Ave. Would this benefit the existing tax payers in that area? Why not sell the property to one of the adjacent homeowners for a couple of thousand dollars and let them pay the taxes on the land and maintain the property which the boro has the obligation to do now.

L. Bussinelli

9:24 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

The lot as it stands currently would not be deemed buildable without several variances granted. Secondly, this should not even be a tax issue so much as an issue of common sense and safety.

Reply

Sir

9:27 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

Leave it as open space. We don't need to jam another house into a small lot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

GarageRock

9:53 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Keep your opinions to yourself, "Sir"...stop posting on every article...you look like the neighborhood idiot.

Joe

9:52 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

R. Swanson, at the cost of $14k per year to put a SINGLE child to school, do you think that the $11,000 in taxes will cover even that? Now imagine anyone moving into that house, in that location, with any fewer than two kids, at this point in Chatham's history. Highly unlikely. Two kids -- it will cost the town $28,000 per year to develop, in school OPERATING costs alone. But the house's taxes would stay fixed at, say, $11k. Think.

Reply
Comment_arrow

R. Swanson

2:42 pm on Monday, August 13, 2012

Joe: your math makes no sense. First of all, if you believe the Chatham School District, they are spending much less than $14k per student. They claim it costs $11k or so, but the important point is that this is only a calculation that takes the total budget and divides it by the number of kids in the District. It doesn't mean that if 10 new kids join the District that you need to come up with $110 - 140,000 in new money. The infrastructure and the teaching staff is already in place - the new kids simply take a seat. Think, please - I hope this isn't too complicated for you. Look - if the lots aren't buildable, that's one thing. If they are buildable, there is no good reason for the town not to return these parcels to private ownership. Otherwise an "open space" tax ought to be levied against the adjacent property owners who are benefitting from the undeveloped parcels (home values, views, etc.) without paying for that benefit.

Duncan Munchkin

10:15 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

Bruce Harris thought it would look more like a village if you cover every available blade of grass with a smushed up house. One look at the new house they shoehorned in on Center St. should dissuade anyone from building on these lots. The thing looks like a Colonial run through a trash compactor.

Reply

Rabbit Run

11:05 am on Monday, August 13, 2012

Mr Harris et al need to take a common sense break! The Borough will bust your proverbial nuggets and run you through the ringer should you try to build a small addition on our abnormally small lots in town- but lo and behold!...they are willing to sell and build on these postage stamp lots!? They will happily grant a slew of variances for these lots but stifle reasonable building throughout the Borough? What a sad sad state of affairs.

Reply

corkie ziegler

7:34 am on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Has anyone who supports building a house on such a small and oddly shaped lot considered the impact of the construction on the FOUR heavily traveled crosswalks that children from ALL levels of schooling (Washington, St. Pat's, CMS, CHS, and Lafayette) use during the day on what is already a VERY busy street? It is about safety, not about aesthetics. There are parking ordinances regarding how close one can be to crosswalks, and the busy intersections of Chatham Street and Lafayette Avenue cannot handle construction trucks, children, and speeding cars safely. Oh, did we mention losing 6 or more beautiful shade trees in order to build on that space?

Reply

Sir

9:55 pm on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

TrashMan, look in the mirror. You are a 2 bit clown.

Reply

Leave a comment